Parental Consent Is Not Required, Informed Consent Definitely IS!

May be an image of child, standing and outdoors

The Vaccine Minister, (yes, we have a minister for the jab!)

According to the UK vac cine minister Nadhim Zahawi, children between 12-15 won’t need parental consent in some cases, he says “In the rare occasion were there is a difference of opinion with the parent who doesn’t want their child vaccinated, and the 12/13 year wanting their vaccine, then the first thing that will happen is the clinician will bring them together to try and reach consensus, if that is not possible and the 12 year old is deemed to be competent to make that decision (Gillick competence) then they CAN HAVE THE VAC CINE”

BBC Propaganda Aimed At The Children

The BBC, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, has not only decided that the children should know that they do not need to ask for their parents permission, but have taken it upon themselves to attempt to empower and motivate the children to rebel against their parents wishes concerning the jab. Through a propaganda filled film aimed at the children, they inform them that they do not need parental consent to get themselves jabbed. It is clear that the aim of the film is to allow children to feel not only empowered, but justified in going against their parents wishes, advice and guidance. SEE HERE

Are thOSE VACCINATING the children, even informed themselves?

Therefore, regardless of the due diligence taken by many parents, it now appears that less informed marketers and vaccinators are now able to persuade the children to cast aside the better judgement of their loving guardians and parents and receive the unapproved, Pfizer/Biotech shot. This vaccine is for some reason the jab deemed to be safe for use in children by the UK Medicine Regulator; MHRA.

Gates and Conflict of Interest

Gloved hands holding a vaccine bottle and syringe.

(However, It is important to note here, Gates owns major shares in both Pfizer and Biotech and has also gifted a £980,000 grant to the MHRA in 2017, with over £3 million invested in the UK Medicine Regulator since then.

WILL THE CHILDREN BE INFORMED OF THIS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

WILL THEY BE INFORMED AT ALL?

COVID-19 vaccines for children and teens are coming ...

WILL THEY BE INFORMED that they are guinea pigs in an experimental “vaccine” trials which are to continue until 2023?

WILL THEY BE INFORMED and made to understand that this means, the data for long term, or future consequences of receiving the jab, does not exist?

Surely they WILL BE INFORMED of the results of only two months of trials where 86% of children who took part, suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer jab, ranging from mild to extremely serious?

Or that 1 in 9 children suffered a severe adverse reaction which left them unable to perform daily activities?

WILL THEY BE INFORMED of the higher risk in adolescents of the vac cine causing an inflammatory response?, in other words, Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) cases?

WILL THEY BE INFORMED by the jabbers that in fact, the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI) did NOT recommend jabbing 12 to 15 year olds?

WILL THEY BE INFORMED that the vac cine has primarily been given the go ahead due to “emergency approval”? Yet there is no emergency affecting children, (aside from the psychological damage inflicted upon them).

WILL THEY BE INFORMED that IF they were ever to contract a virus that is deemed to be SARS-COV2, the chances of dying as a result is negligible? In the first year of the “pandemic” the mortality rate for children, was a rate of 2 per million in England. Nevertheless, of these sad deaths, most had an underlying comorbidity, particularly neurodisability and life-limiting condition, but all had tested positive with a test that does not distinguish a virus.

THEY SHOULD BE INFORMED THAT Esteemed scientists have discovered that vaccinating individuals DOES NOT stop, or even slow the spread of the alleged Covid-19 variants, leading them to conclude that natural immunity is by far more effective and protective than this jab!

THEY SHOULD BE INFORMED that the U.K. Governments report of collated data via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme.

THEY SHOULD BE INFORMED that after an estimated 21.9 million first doses and 18.1 million second doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, the MHRA had received 314,700 reports of adverse reactions!. This means that for every 69 people injected with the Pfizer jab an adverse reaction has been suffered. The MRHA admits, between 1 and 10% of people report their adverse reactions, and are more likely to be the younger people!

THEY MOST CERTAINLY SHOULD BE INFORMED, that children have DIED as a result of being vaccinated! It is, of course, unlikely they will inform the children at all, as it is unlikely that they even inform themselves with the facts. Surely they wouldn’t be playing Russian Roulette with other people’s children if they did!?